Tuesday, February 2, 2021

Thank you, LKY

 
Lee Kuan Yew

Double Standards are impersonated in the late L K Yew.. The Only Dictator been celebrated by the Democratic Media Lobbies.. If he was East European, Arab, or South Asian, the unmerciful name-n-shame campaigns would follow him to the grave.. But it is Singapore, the financial hub for Asia, the maritime gate between East and West, and a tiny city-state; a fantastic lab for both democracy and monopoly..


https://youtu.be/QJaEIzVoWOU

 

Yes, he had built a Nation, but a Police State..

Yes, he had assembled a cosmopolitan, but with Iron Fest..

Yes, he had built a city, but with a Democracy Cost..

Yes, he had built a government, with a Ruling Family..

Once he had traded affordable apartments with sterilization of mentally disadvantage-forced-married couples (mid 1980th - approximately 1,800 couples)

It is prohibited to chew gum in streets or public areas..!

 



https://edition.cnn.com/videos/world/2015/03/22/cnni-mann-pkg-former-singapore-pm-lee-kuan-yew-dead.cnn

Let’s read his fan..
What is the dark side of Lee Kuan Yew?

J Cheng

Updated 3 years ago · Upvoted by Theodore Chanlives in Singapore (2003-present) and 

Osmond Nglives in Singapore (1981-present) · Author has 2.8K answers and 4.8M answer views

 

Mr Lee can be like a gangster and totally ruthless with his opponents. It is instructive to listen to his interview with Tim Sebastian. Tim was a tough interviewer known to be provocative and pointed.

There are stories of how intimidating he could be in meetings. He had the "look" that seemed to bore into one’s soul. He was also totally dedicated to Singapore. Right down to making sure that it was kept clean. A story of told of how after the passing of his beloved wife, he was walking along the Singapore River to nurse his grief. He spotted a piece of rubbish in the river and instructed his security detail to take a picture and report it to the relevant agency.

It's easy to judge Mr Lee Kuan Yew and say that he was heartless and ruthless. He was dealt a very poor deck of cards to begin with.

1.    The Communists were for more ruthless. Stories are told of execution squads where opponents were eliminated or made examples of as a warning to others. See this for further reading on the Communists J Cheng's answer to How likely will Lee Hsien Loong use the ISA against people who do not share his views on governing Singapore as his father did?

2.    Sectarian violence threatened to rip the new nation apart

3.    The Malay Nationalists were bent on destroying him and his party

4.    The British were determined to hang onto their crown colony. As the old saying goes, one does not rule an empire by being nice. Special Branch was observing him and there were plans to arrest him as they thought he was pro communist

5.    Population boom meant it was hard to find jobs and this was a power keg which the Communists tapped into

6.    Housing was in short supply with many living in squalor

7.    Gangs were rife and infiltrated the police force. There were no go areas for the police. Mr Lee Kuan Yew had to use the Internal Security Act to detain gangsters (Thanks to Lindsay Tan for his input)

8.    The economy had to be rebuilt along with housing and infrastructure. This caused many to be displaced and much resentment

9.    Defence needed to be built up rapidly so National Service was enacted

10.  A national savings scheme was setup to provide for retirement as the new nation count not afford a pension type scheme


It is true that many were affected by his actions i.e. being displaced etc. What would you have done in his shoes? Play nice?

 


No comments:

Post a Comment